I’d even go as far as to say that the composition-or framing of the image-is just as good if not better than the first. However, the layering of the image (foreground, midground, and background) is actually very strong, and the forest isn’t all too bad either. If you look closely, it doesn’t even make an attempt to render human hands. Stable Diffusion (Dream Studio): At first glance, this render simply isn’t in the same ballpark as the Midjourney work that shows up first.That’s also not to mention the “densely-packed forest” behind our robot, which shows quite a lot of depth and complexity note that the foreground elements are in focus and the background is nice and soft-just as you would get from a photograph. Not only is it the only rendition that even attempts to replicate complex human features, but it does so with impressive levels of detail. Midjourney: It’s clear to see that Midjourney objectively produced the best image here.Funny to think that this controversial new medium actually opened up opportunities for painters to be more creative. This actually allowed them to lean further into the funk zone with their style to complement photography instead of compete with it. It pushed them over the edge into accepting photography as the best medium for capturing life’s fleeting moments. This movement of AI taking over reminds me of painters’ reacting to the advent of photography back in the 1820s the majority of them were outraged, but it also had a hefty influence on impressionist painters. That being said, resistance to new innovations in artistry is nothing new. As of right now, there’s still not a definitive yes or no as to whether these generative AI programs are on the right or wrong side of the law-though we do at least know that AI-generated images can not be copyrighted. Things are obviously very complicated right now and the matter is actively being investigated by the United States Office of Copyright. The key issue here is generative AI that can replicate artists’ styles-which is already possible using a program called Midjourney. It’s important to note that AI isn’t simply copying and pasting other artists’ work into one giant mashup. Are they flat-out stealing it? Not really. Are they trained using art made by humans? Yes. It doesn’t take a lot of research to realize all of these programs understand art through machine learning: algorithms that are merely recognizing patterns and well… not much else. Along with those factors I also fed each with identical prompts to see how they rendered four different scenes.īefore we start, I’d be remiss not to discuss claims that AI Image Generators are “stealing” other artists’ work. My comparison analyzed cost, ease of use, image resolution, dynamic range, composition, creativity, post-processing, and even speed. LogoMakr’s easy to use canvas gives you endless design possibilities, so feel confident that you’ve found the BEST software to design your custom logo, invitation, flyer, banner and pretty much any design need you have.Prompt: Darth vader as an EDM DJ in front of a massive crowd, cyberpunk vibes, hyperrealistic, dynamic lighting, reflections - ar 4: 5 Matt Crisara via Midjourney With LogoMakr, you don’t need to worry that someone else has your exact design, as you take creative control in designing your one of a kind logo with our abundance of design tool options. Other logo companies use an AI generator and present designs to you which they likely presented to many others in your industry, so your design is never truly unique. Unlike other logo maker apps, LogoMakr allows you to take full charge of your design and customize every inch of your logo without having design skills. LogoMakr is the easiest and most professional way to create a custom logo design that no else has.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |